Saturday, 21 May 2011

rosie perez 2009

rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%


  • dXTC
    Oct 27, 11:48 AM
    I already got two potential Christmas presents early:

    http://hackadaycom.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/apple-tv-2.jpg
    (lovin' it something fierce!)

    and

    http://www.coffee-maker-review.net/images/keurig-elite-b40-21241758.jpg

    Would love to have this:

    http://www.devicemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/macbook-air-11.6-inch1.jpg

    or this:

    http://regmedia.co.uk/2010/01/27/ipad_rgb.jpg

    But since my budget nowadays says "oh hells to the naw", I'll probably have to settle for this:

    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT1t91VRP9ThJ-ppsn3tsRqQidka1d6JoOEqfEG_TflnVEzKZpn7-feuu6o0TAgZtrv5whrXyH5BOTSrt8MRnCGCuPAxMf58ilf8twbXkusSSbUvO9IPpUWettxKD70fleJyFAiBxnzfNI/s1600/hojoboxset.jpg

    It's the 3-CD box set of Howard Jones's first two albums, being released soon on his Dtox label. Warner/Elektra gave Howard and his keyboard tech Robbie Bronnimann access to the original master tapes, and they've digitally remastered the albums with reportedly much better sound quality than the original CD issues. The third bonus disc, named after his rare "Risk" singles, contains live tracks from early performances.




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%


  • CJM
    May 3, 07:53 AM
    The IPS tech screens are removed from specs...
    Have they moved to TN panel sinstead...?

    Yeah.. Wtf? Can anyone clarify?




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%


  • firestarter
    Apr 24, 08:29 PM
    You mean as the perpetrators did, right? Just checking.

    I don't understand your point. Yes, the perpetrators were violent and committed assault. :confused:




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%


  • Sky Blue
    Aug 15, 01:53 PM
    Aww, no more blue filling up URL bar in Safari?

    I like the definition in Spotlight



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%


  • Cheerwino
    Apr 14, 07:44 AM
    Guys, which one should I get?

    I've been trying to score an iPad2 and now here comes the new ix.Mac.MarketingName, which sounds awesome! So between this and iPad2, ATV2, Air, MBP, iPhone, Mac Pro, Nano and iMac, what should I get?

    Mostly I would use this for web surfing and light photo editing, but it also needs to dry laundry and serve as daily transportation for my 8 mile commute. But, I'm worried the new ix.Mac.MarketingName requires Z-rated tires, which are quite expensive. I'm also curious whether, with the right apps, the ix.Mac.MarketingName can serve as a prophylactic or if it's better to have a dedicated device for that.

    So, whaddya think? What other ix.Mac.MarketingName rumors have you heard? :apple:




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%


  • diamond.g
    Apr 11, 02:43 PM
    ...snip...
    All I can say is, "Thank God." Near term I get rid of tons of cables -- I have seven attached to my MBP on my desktop right now (external monitor, FW800 for external drive, Ethernet, FW400 for scanner, USB for keyboard, USB for printer, and audio out to external speakers). Long-term it is possible Thunderbolt will enable changes we can't envision right now.

    My only issue is the name "Thunderbolt" and the weird lightening bolt (that to date has always meant "touch this an you die from electrocution"). Light Peak was nearly perfect IMHO. Oh well, I'm guessing some committee group came up with this.

    How are you going to reduce the number of cables? It seems like you would still need the same number of cables.



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%


  • kainjow
    Nov 4, 10:27 AM
    Well. I have to say Bravo! VMWare!!!!
    It use SOOOOOOO little amount of memory compare to Parallels (4xxMB vs 2.xxGB), so there is better system performance. I cannot wait to test it on my Macbook but the different on my Mac Pro was HUGE!!

    I agree. VMware is already very good for a private beta (don't ask me how I got it ;)). Very fast already, and the app itself starts up about 5x faster than Parallels. And it uses a Cocoa native interface yay!




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%


  • SciFrog
    Oct 24, 07:44 PM
    We are wrapping our best week ever, PPD is now 175k and our outlook is better.

    Yet we only have two people using bigadv units... We can do much better :cool:



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%


  • robby818
    Apr 28, 10:34 PM
    Using my digital calipers the white is .01" thicker, I am using the same case from my black iPhone and it seems to fit just fine. Didn't notice any difference till I heard about it.

    Sweet pics. :D




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%


  • halse
    Nov 3, 10:24 AM
    I signed up for this months ago, may have to do so again since I didn't get a reply yet, my guess is that Fusion will be (somewhat) better and (slightly) more expensive than Parallels



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%


  • kcmac
    Apr 22, 05:28 PM
    I don't mind the looks of it. I have the iPhone 4 and after getting the iPad 2 feel like the 4 is too boxy. Love the curved sides of the iPad 2.

    Wondering where the antenna is on this mock up. Is it the entire back? What is the outline around the side view? A clear covering? Or just artwork?




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%


  • WildCowboy
    Oct 18, 10:07 PM
    Apple has had a phenomenal run. They are doing this on all fronts. They have 2 Billion CASH! That is a big deal. It keeps the R&D funded.

    Actually they have over $6 billion in cash and another almost $4 billion in liquid, short term investments...so they really have $10 billion in cash, up from just over $8 billion a year ago.



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%


  • KingYaba
    May 1, 10:30 PM
    President Obama will let us know soon ... it is being reported that it was an intelligence mission carried out by US forces

    Awesome. I can't wait to read about the details.




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%


  • quigleybc
    Aug 15, 04:23 PM
    Still... meh.


    I agree,

    Can't wait to spend $130.00 for those features !! :rolleyes:


    too bad I totally will.....:o



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%


  • nowonder24
    Apr 28, 11:33 PM
    Anecdotal evidence is so exciting!

    Exactly my point ;)




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%


  • robkot
    Apr 22, 04:27 PM
    It is know that apple has serval prototype iPhones. This is interesting at the least but seeing 3G at the top kinda sucks. We need a 4g faster device.



    more...

    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%


  • iJohnHenry
    Feb 1, 09:07 AM
    I was just curious, because it seems as if it is a "different" person posting. Perhaps in a day or two we'll see you posting how your little sister or mom got hold of your MacRumors account and posted all kind of weird stuff.




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%


  • boodyup
    Apr 26, 12:27 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Seriously, can you do anything without Apple getting their cut? It seems odd that you would buy music from them then have to pay to store it. It's like earning your paycheck after income and state tax are taken out and then buying something with the money and getting charged sales tax on it.




    rosie perez 2009. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%


  • chrono1081
    Dec 5, 06:07 AM
    All I want for Christmas is an awesome snowboarding season! I finally got to go today for the first time since 2008 :eek:




    sparkomatic
    Mar 11, 07:30 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Almost there and they just announced that all the AT&T's are gone. Also the 16 and 32 white are gone. Uh oh!




    jsf8x
    Jul 14, 02:29 PM
    Lol




    DrinkingLizard
    Jun 26, 11:42 PM
    Apple definitely should give you a warning that you're about to purchase an app more costly than $75. Although this kid obviously only went to the app because of its cost.

    I've heard this general idea mentioned by a few people but I'm more than a little curious as to why it's always $75 that's mentioned as the threshold.

    Why is this? What is so special about $75?




    Legion93
    May 1, 11:44 PM
    I would just like to mention two things:

    1. Today is yom hashoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day)
    2. Yesterday, April 30, 2011 is the anniversary of Hitler's death.

    Just want to through those two items out there

    You mean this was meant to happen?

    It's the devil's code!




    jhu
    Oct 23, 08:23 PM
    how is this any different than apple's end user-license agreement for mac os x? here is section 2A (http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/macosx104.pdf):


    This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time. This License does not allow the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer at a time, and you may not make the Apple Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple computer at the same time.

    the language implies that virtualization on the same machine using the same software is forbidden. on the other hand, windows xp's end-user licence agreement (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/eula.mspx) also has similar language disallowing multiple copies of the same software to be run on the same computer:

    1.1 Installation and use. You may install, use, access, display and run one copy of the Software on a single computer, such as a workstation, terminal or other device ("Workstation Computer"). The Software may not be used by more than one processor at any one time on any single Workstation Computer.

    microsoft's vista license just makes the virtualization part explicit. so i don't know what the hubub is over vista's license since the mac os x and windows xp licenses say the same thing, but not explicitly.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment