Monday 30 May 2011

faye reagan valentine

faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • iEvolution
    Mar 22, 09:15 PM
    Nice! Best news I've heard for a long time.

    I will be updating to the 220GB just for video output..would be nice if they would add high definition output.

    I love the people that act like 220GB is a ridiculous amount, with the file sizes always increasing (FYI, the estimate of 40,000 songs with the current 160GB is a miscalculation, how many things are still selling 128kbps songs and how many people are still using that bit rate?) an increase in capacity is ALWAYS welcome.

    Further, add videos to the classic and 220GB would be considered small.




    faye reagan valentine. Faye Reagan
  • Faye Reagan


  • MacRumors
    Aug 6, 08:37 PM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    MacRumorsLive.com (http://www.macrumorslive.com/) will provide live coverage of the event starting at 1PM EDT (10AM Pacific). No need to reload the page, updates will appear as they are posted. In January, our system successfully delivered updates to over 100,000 (http://www.macrumors.com/events/mwsf2006-stats.php) simultaneous visitors.

    More photos of banners posted at WWDC have been circulating. Apple appears to be taking on Microsoft's upcoming Vista operating system directly with banners that state:

    "Mac OS X Leopard, Introducing Vista 2.0" (photo (http://static.flickr.com/74/207241438_7c0f89412d_b.jpg))
    "Mac OS X Leopard, Hasta la Vista, Vista"

    In the meanwhile, you can read the WWDC 2006 Rumor Roundup (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805162310.shtml), see our WWDC related Guide Pages (http://guides.macrumors.com/Category:WWDC_2006), chat in our IRC channel (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2003/06/20030608214842.shtml) or participate in the forums (http://forums.macrumors.com).

    We will continue to provide any last minute updates leading to the event.

    Digg This (http://digg.com/apple/MacRumorsLive_No_WWDC_Live_QT_Stream_No_Problem)




    faye reagan valentine. Sexy Faye Reagan/Valentine
  • Sexy Faye Reagan/Valentine


  • surroundfan
    Sep 6, 09:24 AM
    Sometimes it's about form over function. This is nothing new for Apple.

    Well quite, but it's going to lock the Mac Mini into being a poor value proposition.




    faye reagan valentine. Faye Reagan Valentine - Faye
  • Faye Reagan Valentine - Faye


  • Yamcha
    Mar 25, 08:27 PM
    I think this is pretty cool, but I agree that quite a lot of the games are fairly low quality, I don't know how it'll be enjoyable on 1080P, I downloaded Asphalt from the mac app store, and honestly it was crap :P.. I've tried lots of FPS games on my iPod Touch, and again the experience just isn't the same as you'd get from a console or PC gaming..

    Apple needs to find a new way to improve the gaming experience, like for example make iPad compatible joysticks, I know that there some out there (third party), but what I want to see is Apple making one specifically for the ipad..

    The problem I've found on my iPod Touch is that the fingers take far too much space, at least for games that have a joystick on the screen.. Not a good experience, and the same apply's to the iPad, although sure we have a much bigger screen, still I think gamers like to be able to use a real joystick, instead of using a touch based one.. I know I do..




    faye reagan valentine. IMG_5603 - Faye Reagan
  • IMG_5603 - Faye Reagan


  • Eorlas
    Mar 23, 02:03 AM
    Demanding a larger hard drive so that large size songs that are uncompressed and run at a higher bit rate becomes a moot point. A person's ears are only going to be able to tell the difference in quality up to a certain point. And that threshold becomes even more insignificant with more headphone listening time depending on how loud the individual listens to their music.

    There will always be people that say that they can tell the difference, but in all honesty, they can't.




    faye reagan valentine. the Porn Star Faye Reagan
  • the Porn Star Faye Reagan


  • rdowns
    Mar 19, 11:58 AM
    That's one possible reason for delaying. More here (http://www.timeslive.co.za/world/article973767.ece/British-press-raps-Obama-over-Libya-no-fly-zone-delay).

    (FWIW, I don't disagree with you that it's time for other nations to do more)




    Editorials, they're like *******s. :D

    Many on the right and some on the left here have been all over him for dragging his feet. Murdoch's NY rag said Hillary was the only one who wanted to take military action and it took her 3 weeks to gather enough administration support. Then again, who the hell knows?




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine. quello
  • faye reagan valentine. quello


  • 8CoreWhore
    May 2, 04:58 PM
    Apple sees the benefit of unifying how things work across OS X and iOS.

    There are tons of people that don't know how to install or uninstall apps on their PC, but they do on their iPhone or iPad. By unifying, those people feel comfortable buying a Mac.




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • DualShock
    Mar 24, 03:09 PM
    Um, I believe credit for this should actually go to netkas:

    http://netkas.org/?p=679

    He (with rominator) reported over a week ago that the 10.6.6 build with the ThunderBook Pro's can drive PC Radeon 6xxx cards as is.




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine. faye
  • faye reagan valentine. faye


  • cube
    Mar 24, 03:33 PM
    So then use Windows?


    Why would I look at anything else if it were OK to use Windows?




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine. Faye Valentine / Faye Reagan; Faye Valentine / Faye Reagan. MrChurchyard. Apr 14, 04:20 AM. It wouldn#39;t be too difficult for Apple to
  • faye reagan valentine. Faye Valentine / Faye Reagan; Faye Valentine / Faye Reagan. MrChurchyard. Apr 14, 04:20 AM. It wouldn#39;t be too difficult for Apple to


  • zoran
    Nov 21, 10:10 AM
    This rumor seems to be only a rumor! Its Nov 21st today, when will octos come? Next year i guess... damn it!:mad:




    faye reagan valentine. American actress. faye
  • American actress. faye


  • VyseTheLegend
    Sep 14, 09:33 PM
    NYC-- there are 6 of them I went to and each sells different cases. Some more than others. Yes, it is dark purple. ;)

    Which store in NYC? I've been looking for that dark blue/dark purple one.




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • blahblah100
    Apr 26, 01:15 PM
    anyone else getting a little bit fed up of apples lawsuits?

    Only if it's Apple being sued. Remember, when Apple sues, they are just protecting their intellectual property. Only when another company sues Apple is it frivolous and annoying and a case of where the plaintiffs are just trying to ride Apple's coattails. :rolleyes:

    If you read the forums, it's very clear: lawsuits are only valid if Apple is the plaintiff.




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • quagmire
    Apr 9, 04:45 PM
    I know how to drive a manual, but it has been ages since last time I have been in one and I wouldn't want to get in a high powered car with a manual where breaking anything will cost $$$$ due to my lack of experience in one.




    faye reagan valentine. Sexy Faye Reagan/Valentine
  • Sexy Faye Reagan/Valentine


  • Mattsasa
    Apr 2, 07:43 PM
    I'll "believe" when they fix the currently unresolved and widespread quality control issues...light bleed on virtually every unit and blemishes, dents and scratches on units straight out of the box.

    Fix those issues, Apple, and then I will "believe" enough to get an iPad 2.

    what the **** are you talking about?!!!

    you are getting false information, I would dare say 99% of ipad 2s have absolutely no hardware problem.




    faye reagan valentine. IMG_5064 - Faye Reagan
  • IMG_5064 - Faye Reagan


  • bretm
    Jul 20, 10:11 AM
    iPod sales GROWTH is slowing, but iPod sales are still speeding up.

    30% more than same quarter last year...

    Increasing. Not speeding up.




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • dethmaShine
    May 2, 05:24 PM
    If you click on Show Content on any app and replace the first three files from an app downloaded from the app store it will happen with any app you want.

    Right Click -> Show Package Contents -> Contents

    Copy:
    _CodeSignature
    _MASReceipt
    CodeResources

    Then select and app not from the Mac App Store and Right Click -> Show Package Contents -> Contents

    Then paste the three files. After you reboot your Mac it should work.
    (This has been working since the past DP)

    Im on DP 2 Update 3. This un-installation process applies to all external apps, not just MAS apps. No code, no change required. :)




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • AidenShaw
    Aug 26, 09:26 AM
    What do you think about the rumours that a single socket Conroe thanks to it�s superior memory handling effiency (~70%?) compared to Xeons DB-Dimm�s lousy (~25?) might crush a dual socket Xeon in memory intesive tasks, like photoshop.

    Have you heard seen any data on that one,exept the specuatlion on Anandtech?
    It's nonsense, frankly.

    It is speculation (or FUD) based on a single facet of the system design, without considering all of the factors that affect real application performance. (Remember when Apple was whining about the horrible "pipeline bubble" problem with the Pentium - meanwhile Pentiums and Xeons were benchmarking just fine against the Apples?)

    Dell has submitted SPEC results for Woodcrest and Conroe systems, and they're virtually the same - with a very slight advantage to Conroe.




    faye reagan valentine. Faye Reagan and Georgia Jones
  • Faye Reagan and Georgia Jones


  • gkarris
    Nov 27, 09:04 PM
    IMAGINED?

    Let's look at the facts.

    20" Apple $699 - Dell $399
    23" Apple $999 - Dell $799 (24")
    30" Apple $1999 - Dell $1499

    Those are real numbers. Dell has brighter specs, more connection options, and with the 23" they have a 24" that's still $200 cheaper.

    What imaginary planet are you on? $300, $200, and $500 difference in price respectively. That's real money. And it pressures people into considering a Dell. (Bad Apple!) All you are really getting for those extra hundres of dollars is a display that looks nice with your mini, MBP, or MP.

    You claim that Apple's monitors are selling well, but you have no facts to back that up. Apple doesn't post their sales numbers for products like this so you're just making it up. Those sales numbers could suck a$$ and you wouldn't know. And I believe they do suck, but Apple won't tell you that, it sucks because they want them to suck. Keep reading.

    I believe Apple does this to encourage people to buy iMacs. If your willing to pony up $2400 or more on a Mac Pro then maybe an extra $500 doesn't bother you for the two 30" displays your going to use, and if all you can afford is mini Apple doesn't seem to mind you buying that Dell monitor. By pricing the monitors several hundred more than they are really worth, you are now in the iMac price range. I bet if you could see and add up the numbers, buying a mini and an over priced cinema display gives Apple the same profit margin as an iMac. Apple doesn't have a mid range tower. Again, because they want to sell you an iMac. By keeping their product line simple they reduce costs; making one widget as apposed to five different widgets is cheaper. But that limits choice.

    I have an iMac, but I really don't want one. I want a mid-range tower and an external monitor. I'm not alone either. Apple's monitor price is a "choice incentive". It may help their bottom line, but it limits my choice. And since I hate Windows I'm forced into Apple's program. This is really what people are complaining about here. They want a mini and 20" cinema for under $1000, and I want a 23" and tower for under $2000, not a 24" iMac!

    So, back to a 17" cinema. Why would Apple do this? I don't think they will. A 17" iMac is only $899. That's where they make their money, oh, and people like me willing to pay premium because we value esthetics.

    Didn't you read this post and the article attached?

    "but, that's not worth the extra dollars for me"

    Ding-Ding-Ding! You answered all of your above complaints and whining about Apple's prices. You aren't the target audience for their displays.

    (note: I would suggest you see my comp specs and gear below before reading my post further)

    Perhaps it is an oversight of Apples that they sell both consumer and pro-sumer computers, and yet only offer a pro-sumer monitor. However considering that 2 of the 3 consumer computers by Apple have built in monitors, and the 3rd is meant to be used with exisiting mouse, keyboard and monitor, it may not be such a big deal.

    Also, if you want cheaper, there exists cheaper. It's not as if Apple is robbing you of much needed options in montior selection by not offering a cheap monitor. Any monitor made today will work with your Mac. The only thing they are robbing you of is their design.

    Now don't anyone bring up the "Apple is bad because of what I can get from Dell" topic again until you read this very carefully (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=252327)
    .
    In summery though, Apple uses a different, far more advanced color accurate panel for their monitors. This allows them certification that they pay for. They also pay someone with a design background to make the casing, and don't have the EE's do it like at some companies :rolleyes:

    Now, back on topic :)

    I was in the "Apple needs to make a 17" monitor" crowd for a long time. Than I bought a cheap 20" wide display, and I love it. I suppose with Photography and a few games here and there, there is a reason I'm inclined to now say I wouldn't use a smaller screen. But unless Apple wants to sell a consumer display (which they don't currently do), to be used with the Mac Mini, I really don't see much of a reason for Apple to do it. A pro-sumer 17" display is useless and pointless IMHO. If you have a 3 grand G5 doing professional graphics/video work, you aren't going to buy a pro-sumer 17" monitor for $400 :rolleyes:


    That said, if Apple had offered a consumer level 20" wide monitor at a similar price point to Dells, I'd have bought it hands down.

    It's clearly known that Apple monitors are pro quality and Dell ones are cheap consumer quality, hence the price difference...




    faye reagan valentine. faye reagan valentine.
  • faye reagan valentine.


  • Stella
    Jun 24, 08:46 AM
    We hope, Jobs said - many different iOS products later this year...

    In other words:
    Many more locked down products this year
    :p




    FreeState
    Mar 23, 03:00 PM
    The App has been pulled because it is not in compliance with developer guidelines.


    http://www.cultofmac.com/apple-pulls-gay-cure-app-over-dev-guidelines/87815

    Apple spokesman Tom Neumayr said Wednesday:

    �We removed the Exodus International app from the App Store because it violates our developer guidelines by being offensive to large groups of people.�




    MrFrankly
    Aug 29, 09:05 AM
    I think it's ridiculous to not put a Core 2 Duo chip into the Mini. While I'm not waiting for Merom, to upgrade one of your machines with a faster version of the same soon-to-be-out-of-date chip is silly.

    I think Apple is more concerned with price for the Mac Mini than speed. Make them just a little bit faster than they are now, but much cheaper.

    They're too expensive in the line-up now, with merom they would stay the same price but with Yonah they can make them cheaper again.




    KirkL
    Mar 31, 06:40 AM
    Can you post a screenshot?

    http://d2omthbq56rzfx.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-Shot-2011-03-30-at-9.31.06-PM-670x462.png




    vouder17
    Aug 16, 07:26 AM
    Digitimes = lies!




    ZebraineZ
    Jun 22, 03:37 PM
    I wouldn't mind an iOS-type OS on an iMac as long as it had some more features of a full-fledged desktop OS. As in:

    -Multiple Users
    -Printing
    -Some kind of file system
    -More apps of a creative side (ie movie editing, word processing, programming, etc.) instead of just media consuming apps

    Note: this list is not exhaustive; there are many more features I'd like that I just can't think of at the moment.

    Plus, some games/apps will need to be done, specifically those that need the accelerometers. I don't think people would want to swing around a 20/30 pound computer. But that would be a good way to make more money; people keep breaking them so they'll have to pay for repairs/new ones.



    I doubt 10.7 will be such an overhaul. Probably more like Mac OS X 11.0 or a totally new naming scheme.

    You just described a touchless OS X. It does exactly that...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment